Which Reality Is Yours?

Millions play world-wide, many for numerous hours a day, and many have multiple player accounts that are regularly used. Online role playing games have become a staple in our society. This can be seen by the vast number of consumers using multiplayer online role playing games, but also through the amount of money game developers generate through these games. Forbes.com reported a research firm estimated that game developers pulled in 292 million dollars in 2005, from subscription fees alone (*). These games present an interesting medium in that the messages are delivered in a virtual reality.

            This medium allows players, who are in tern consumers, to display messages that they would otherwise not be able to demonstrate outside of virtual reality.  Therefore, this medium is extremely important because it is one, if not the only one, that allows members of society to consciously exchange messages in a setting outside the constraints of reality. What I mean here is that virtual reality allows people to act in ways that they would hesitate or fail to do so in reality. Croteau and Hoynes write that “participants in virtual culture can take on new roles. They can change sex or age or occupation and interact electronically with an altered identity” (150).

(above: players are broadcasting messages to other unknown players)

            Another interesting aspect that online role-playing games offer is that they allow users to interact on a personal level, one-one-one, and broadcast mass messages to an enormous amount of people. Croteau and Hoynes explain this idea further when they write “computer networks challenge the distinction between a ‘producer’ and ‘receiver’ of media messages, combining characteristics of ‘mass’ communication with one-to-one communication” (150). Thus, unique mediums like role-playing games provide society with a method to distribute messages in more than one manner (personal or mass). With such a massive following, online role-playing games can be considered a leader in virtual reality mediums.

Also, take a look at this extremely bizarre, yet interesting story:

http://www.gamesradar.com/pc/world-of-warcraft-the-burning-crusade/news/the-wow-funeral-raid-four-years-later/a-2010030510656885018/g-20060403131624956087

*http://www.forbes.com/2006/08/07/virtual-world-jobs_cx_de_0807virtualjobs.html

My Child Is An Honor Student...

They can be found profoundly in one spot, numerous times in an area, or can obscenely cover one’s entire vehicle. Bumper Sticks provide an inexpensive yet effective method to communicate to others, mainly through one’s vehicle. Usually placed on the rear of a vehicle, it is inevitable that a bumper stick will have an audience if the vehicle is driven in moderately or greater populated areas. The messages portrayed on bumper sticks are unique in that due to the fact that they must communicate an idea in a timely fashion, the message has to be simple enough that the audience can perceive it before the vehicle drives out of sight.

Although these messages may be short and easy to decode, this does not mean that the audience is constrained to only one interpretation. Croteau and Hoynes explain this when they write “scholars use the term polysemy to describe the notion of multiple meanings in media texts. Media are said to be polysemic – to have multiple meanings” (269). Thus, bumper stickers are a great example of how media messages can be very simplistic, yet have numerous, complex connotations and interpretations to go along with the message. The misconception that complex meanings have to go hand in hand with complex messages is therefore proven incorrect here by bumper stickers. It’s ironic how such an inexpensive item can have such a widespread and powerful influence on audiences nationwide.

Here's a clip about the "Coexist" bumper sticker that can be seen above:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oz2owFORt7Q

Welcome to the Silver Screen

           

It contributes more than 180 billion dollars annually to the United States economy and supports a force of over 2.4 million workers in our nation (*). The film industry is not only extremely far reaching, but tremendously influential on society as well.

Movie stars are idolized by millions of people world-wide, simply through their actions on the movie screen. Yet, what is more intriguing is how the film industry dictates behavior of its audiences and members of society. Take for instance the rating system (G, PG, PG-13, etc.) that the film industry uses to categorize movies. On the surface, this seems to most as a way for parents to deter their children from possibly viewing inappropriate actions. However, by imposing this rating system the film industry not only influences parents on how to raise their children, but it also forbids members of society to act in ways that they would otherwise desire to partake in. Croteau and Hoyness describe this idea further when they write “Like all structures, they have been developed by humans and, subsequently, enable and limit human action” (302). Just as the film industry enables humans to enjoy experiences at home or in the theater, it also limits humans to what they can experience through the content of the film and through the rating system imposed on all movies.

Take a look at an interview with Roger Ebert about the film indusrty: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FCVlQ_5aSI

*http://www.mpaa.org/policy

THROW IT UP

To some it is destructive, ugly, and detrimental to society; to others it is the most artistic and creatively beautiful expression that one could possibly compose. Regardless of how one chooses to perceive it, graffiti can be found in nearly every city across the United States. Encyclopedia Britannica defines graffiti as a “form of visual communication, usually illegal, involving the unauthorized marking of a public space by an individual or group” (Decker). Peaking in the 1970s and 80s, graffiti has refused to die and continues to be an indispensible aspect of urban environments. Due to the fact that graffiti has lasted so long in an environment where so many are working to terminate it, there are obviously many factors that have led to its survival. As graffiti has been prevalent in metropolitan areas for decades, it is undeniable that graffiti has come to have a lasting effect on urban culture through its vivid and valuable communication among peers.

Graffiti by Banksy:

                One of the most predominant uses of graffiti in metropolitan society has proven to be territorial markings. One method of tagging is that of marking gang territory. These gang-related markings are strongly space specific, as street gangs focus on occupying a permanent area. Gangs sometimes even adopt the street names in the location they wish to occupy as their own; further supporting the idea of gangs as place specific. The overall objective of gangs using graffiti is to display power by showing how vast their territory is and how many tags they have accumulated in the area. Due to this style of behavior, gang-related graffiti is generally seen in vast quantities in a compact area. Seldom will a particular gang have tags or throw ups scattered throughout a city.

                Although some may think that a tool used by gangs may be negatively affecting society, graffiti has many other applications. Graffiti is widely used to identify ethnic neighborhoods and it provides artists in urban settings a way to express themselves to their surrounding peers. The issue that some have with graffiti is that they are unable to recognize the benefits that the art provides. Croteau and Hoynes explain this idea when they write “Understanding or ‘decoding’ these messages requires knowledge of the conventions of the medium and the workings of the culture” (275). The vast majority of city officials have extremely limited knowledge and experience with graffiti, other than that they don’t understand what the lettering reads.  In the end however, it doesn’t matter how strong the stance against this medium becomes; the writing on the wall can never be washed away, no matter who or what stands in its way.

 Check out this video about graffiti in NYC during the 1980s

*Decker, Scott H., and Glen Curry. "graffiti." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2009. Encyclopædia

            Britannica Online. 25 Apr. 2009

            <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/240670/graffiti>.   



Don't Step on My J's

Sneakers to some may just be what are thrown on their feet on the way out of their home. However, to others sneakers are an everyday part of their life and even dictate their actions. Some people, called “sneaker heads”, possess massive collections of sneakers that rival the inventories that shoe stores have in stock. The fact that there are many people who have such collections, explain the power that sneakers have in our society.

             One of the most influential people that sparked the love that so many people share for sneakers is none other than Michael Jordan. The real king of basketball set in motion, through his shoes, a feeding frenzy with a bottomless appetite. In the mid 1980s, when Air Jordans first were released, youths went as far as shooting and killing their peers to obtain these sneakers. (*) Although it may seem that Jordans were creating criminals, these sneakers were instead simply creating an extreme passion through the beautiful art on the shoes.

            The Air Jordans are just one example of how important sneakers are too many people in our society. People’s expression through sneakers can be found in numerous aspects of world culture. Two areas where sneakers are a constant element, among many others, are sports and the rap industry. For instance, Nelly created a song called “Air Force Ones” that spoke about one shoe and all its aspects: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfzsMQGqrt0

            The reason for mediums such as sneakers to have such an immense following is described by Croteau and Hoynes when they write “Mass media messages do not allow for the intimate interaction of sender and receiver that characterizes personal communication” (24). Due to the fact that sneakers are so personal, because they are almost exclusively seen on someone’s feet, a connection is made between the sneakers and the person wearing them. This may be the reason why so many sneaker heads congregate on blog sites and conventions held specifically for those who love sneakers.

*From article:  http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2010/04/02/2010-04-02_25_years_later_the_air_jordans_footprint_remains.html

Also, check out a teaser for an upcoming movie called "Jordan Heads", a film that's all about Air Jordans:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hiq9sXHwzIQ